Tag-Archive for » United States Department of Justice «

Florida Purges 53,000 Dead Voters from Rolls. Obama Justice Department Objects to Removing Non-Citizens from Voting Rolls

How many illegal alien and other non-citizen voters should be able to vote in Florida in the 2012 election? The State of Florida has taken a “zero tolerance” approach to this question while the Obama Justice Department seems to be saying “the more the merrier!”

This confrontation has led to a critical showdown in a major swing state just five months before Election Day 2012.

It all began a couple of weeks ago, when Florida election officials began doing what the law requires, attempting to clean its voter rolls of ineligible voters.  Importantly, Florida took action only after Judicial Watch sent a letter to the Florida’s two top election officials requesting information about Florida’s voting list maintenance procedures.  The state’s response to our letter of inquiry disclosed to us the massive number of dead voters on the rolls and a promise to remove them.   You can view our letter to Florida here and the state’s response here.

(Our efforts in Florida are part of Judicial Watch’s 2012 Election Integrity Project. We’re targeting states with the dirtiest voter registration rolls and threatening to sue if they don’t fix the problem. Our legal team is right now preparing lawsuits against three states.  And we are considering our options in several other states.)

Now, Florida did not begin wiping people off lists randomly. Officials simply began notifying individuals on the list they believed may be ineligible and asked them to prove otherwise.

The Obama Justice Department, which seemingly has initiated a systematic effort to make sure voter rolls remain dirty, objected to this initiative. On May 31, 2012, T. Christian Herren, Chief of the Voting Section of the DOJ’s Civil Rights Division,wrote a letter to Florida officials ordering a halt to the voting roll list maintenance process.

In an excellent piece for The National Review, Hans Von Spakovksy puts this unprecedented move by Justice in perspective: “This goes far beyond Holder’s previous actions, such as belittling claims of voter fraud and trying to stop voter ID and other reform measures intended to improve the integrity of the election process. This letter would directly abet vote thieves in a key state as Holder’s boss seeks re-election this November.”

Hans further points out that Florida is directed by federal law to undertake such a review of voter registration laws and that it is a felony punishable up to three years in prison to make a false claim of citizenship in order to register to vote!

So why is the Justice Department attacking Florida for following federal law?  Why indeed?

The Justice Department’s letter demanded a response by Wednesday of this week. The Justice Department got a response alright, but not the one they wanted.

As reported by Reuter’s:

Florida on Wednesday disputed a Justice Department claim that its controversial voter purge efforts may be illegal and said it was the federal government that appeared to have run afoul of the law.

“The Florida Department of State has a solemn obligation to ensure the integrity of elections in this state,” said Florida Secretary of State Ken Detzner in a letter to the Justice Department.

“Permitting ineligible, non-citizen voters to cast ballots undermines that mission and erodes the justified faith the electorate has in the fairness and reliability of the electoral process,” he added.

So the clean-up will continue! (As will the Justice Department’s legal attack on Florida, I’m sure.)  You can review the Florida’s official response to the Obama Justice Department intimidation tactics here. And here’s a Q&A sheet presented by the Florida State Department that details the state’s position on the illegal voter purge.

The Justice Department “line” is that Florida’s efforts to clean up voter registration lists of non-citizen voters might disenfranchise minority voters. But that is a ridiculous argument that is merely intended to obscure the outright fraud taking place across the country.

In the State of Florida, for example, a state that once decided a presidential election by 537 votes, the Florida examination has already identified 2,700 non-citizens registered to vote – so far.  (Press reports suggest this number could be as high as 180,000.)

And this problem is certainly not limited to Florida.

As The Washington Times noted this week:

Illegal or erroneous voter registration is a national problem. A study by the Pew Center on the States, released in February, found 24 million flawed voter registrations nationwide, or one in eight registrations.

These include inaccurate or duplicate records, people registered in two or more states and almost 2 million voters who are on the books even though they are deceased. The number of bad registrations is daunting; 24 million is larger than the winning margins of the last five presidential races combined. If the 2012 race is close, the potential impact of fraudulent votes is magnified.
“Could illegal voting decide the next presidential election?” the Washington Times editorial asks.  “Steps are being taken by the Justice Department that may help guarantee it.”

In addition to its showdown with the Obama Justice Department, the State of Florida recently lost a battle in court against the Obama campaign over a series of voter integrity initiatives it had planned to implement. According to The Washington Post:

A federal judge on Thursday (May 31) blocked key provisions of a Florida law regulating groups that organize voter-registration drives, escalating a debate over newly restrictive voter-access laws that have become a major issue in the presidential campaign…

…Hinkle blocked Florida from enforcing parts of its new voting law, including provisions that require groups that collect voter registration forms to return them to state officials within 48 hours. The provisions also mandate that all volunteer workers must file sworn statements saying they will obey state laws in registering voters.

I believe the ACLU and Project Vote have been pulling the strings behind the scenes at the Justice Department over these issues. (For example, see this June 20, 2011 letter signed by representatives of both organizations complaining to the Justice Department about Florida’s election integrity law.  As we note in our first article above, we already know that Project Vote and the ACLU each have an “in” with leftists running Obama’s Justice.)

As you well know, Judicial Watch has devised a comprehensive strategy to counter the Obama machine’s scheme to steal the election. We call it our 2012 Election Integrity Campaign. You can read all about this effort here. And if you agree with me that this is one of the most important battles in Judicial Watch’s 17-year history, I hope you’ll consider making a tax-deductible contribution to make sure we have the resources to confront the Obama gang’s scheme on every front.

Judicial Watch does not support or oppose candidates for public office. We do, however, want to make sure that the election is fair and clean. I hope you’ll consider joining this effort.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Zimmerman family challenges Holder on New Black Panthers, says no arrests ‘based solely on your race’

In a letter to Attorney General Eric Holder on Monday, obtained exclusively by The Daily Caller, a family member of George Zimmerman asked the nation’s top law enforcement officer why he has chosen to not arrest members of the New Black Panther Party for their rhetoric — some of which may fit the federal government’s definition of a hate crime — throughout the Trayvon Martin case.

The family member believes the reason Holder hasn’t made those arrests is because he, like the members of the New Black Panther Party, is black.

“I am writing you to ask you why, when the law of the land is crystal clear, is your office not arresting the New Black Panthers for hate crimes?” the family member wrote to Holder.

“The Zimmerman family is in hiding because of the threats that have been made against us, yet the DOJ has maintained an eerie silence on this matter. These threats are very public. If you haven’t been paying attention just do a Google search and you will find plenty. Since when can a group of people in the United States put a bounty on someone’s head, circulate Wanted posters publicly, and still be walking the streets?”

The New Black Panthers have issued ultimatums to the Sanford authorities, saying they want Zimmerman arrested “dead or alive.” They have placed a bounty on Zimmerman’s head, and have called for the building of an army of vigilantes to track him down and effect a citizen’s arrest.

Most recently, the New Black Panther Party has called for violence.

In a conference call recorded over the weekend, the militant group said it planned to “suit up and boot up” and prepare for the next stages of the “race war.”

So far, however, no members of the New Black Panther Party have faced legal consequences.

After citing the U.S. Department of Justice’s published definition of a “hate crime,” the Zimmerman family member wrote that there is “no other explanation” for Holder’s failure to authorize arrests of New Black Panther Party members, other than the fact that Holder himself is black.

“I would surmise that, based on your own definition of a hate crime, you have chosen not to arrest these individuals based solely on your race,” the family member wrote to Holder, insisting too that the was “NO racial component” to the “tragedy” that occurred on the late February night when Zimmerman shot Trayvon Martin.

The Daily Caller has confirmed the identity of the Zimmerman family member but is withholding that person’s identity out of concern for the family’s safety.

The family member also criticized members of Congress who have forcefully criticized police for failing to arrest Georgfe Zimmerman, as well as “the Congressional Black Caucus, the NAACP, Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, Spike Lee, [and] President Barack Obama,” adding that “many” who have commented on the case without having a complete understanding of the facts “no doubt understand the laws of our great nation.”

Noting President Obama’s White House event last week celebrating the 1960 novel “To Kill a Mockingbird,” Zimmerman’s family member drew a novel comparison to the American literary classic.

“Strangely enough this case has a lot of parallels to those of Harper Lee’s ‘To Kill a Mockingbird,’” the letter to Attorney General Holder read. “George Zimmerman has been treated much like Tom Robinson was, chastised for not being the right (or wrong) color and found guilty based on race factors.

“You have the opportunity to act as Atticus [Finch] and do the right thing. Your boss would refer to this as a ‘teachable moment.’”

DOJ spokeswoman Tracy Schmaler has not responded to The Daily Caller’s request for comment on why Holder hasn’t authorized the arrest of any New Black Panther Party members, nor has she answered whether that decision is related to Holder’s race.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Nazi guard freed after German conviction

Sobibor

Image via Wikipedia

A German court sentenced former Nazi death camp guard John Demjanjuk, 91, to five years in jail but then freed him pending a possible appeal and because of his advanced age.

Ukrainian-born Demjanjuk was on Thursday convicted of helping kill almost 30,000 people while a guard at the Sobibor extermination camp in German-occupied Poland in 1943.

But presiding judge Ralph Alt ordered his immediate release, pending a final decision by a federal court and possible appeal, saying the accused no longer posed a threat to society. 

He has also spent the past two years in jail in Munich and, as a stateless person, having been stripped of his US citizenship in 2002, was unlikely to be able to leave the country.

This was the second time Demjanjuk, a retired auto factory worker, was sentenced in connection with Nazi crimes.

In the 1980s he was sentenced to death in Israel after a court found him guilty of being “Ivan the terrible”, the name given to a sadistic Ukrainian guard at the Treblinka death camp.

But the Supreme Court later overturned the decision after establishing they had the wrong man.

On Thursday, following an 18-month trial, a German court decided he had indeed served as a guard, but under his original name “Ivan Demjanjuk“, and at Sobibor.

His German judges said they were convinced he had assisted in the killing of at least 28,060 people, most of them Jews, deported to Sobibor and immediately gassed there between April and August 1943.

The court said Demjanjuk, a former Red Army soldier captured during the war by the Germans, accepted an offer to serve Nazi forces as a prison guard and served at Sobibor from March to September 1943.

He was automatically guilty of assisting in the killings because of the nature of his job there, it found.

Demjanjuk, who pleaded not guilty, kept silent during the trial.

On Thursday, as throughout the trial, he appeared in a wheelchair before being laid down on a hospital bed, his eyes shielded by dark glasses.

He appeared not to follow the case as relayed to him in Ukrainian by an interpreter.

“He’s been playing a comedy all the while,” said Dutch-born Vera de Jong, 71, who lost both her parents, a grandmother and an aunt at Sobibor.

“I’m happy about the verdict. I’m relieved. He needed to be convicted.”

Another co-plaintiff, Rudy Cortissos, also Dutch and whose mother died at Sobibor, said with tears in his eyes that he was “very emotional because he hadn’t reckoned on the judge reading out the names of the relatives killed.”

The judge listed, one by one, the dates at which they were brought by train to the camp, along with the numbers of those immediately gassed.

The eldest Jew killed during that period was 95, the youngest just days old.

Cortissos said he thought the sentence was “satisfactory,” saying that Demjanjuk “will no longer be able to live in peace and freedom… The trial draws a line on the past.”

“It’s just a pity I never saw his eyes,” he added.

Israel’s Yad Vashem Holocaust institute welcomed the verdict.

“While no trial can bring back those that were murdered, holding those responsible to justice has an important moral and educational role in society,” chairman Avner Shalev said.

But Demjanjuk’s son, John Demjanjuk Jr, said the family would appeal and would continue efforts to obtain the “mountain of information still being intentionally concealed by Moscow… and by the US Department of Justice.”

“The Germans have built a house of cards and it will not stand for long,” he said in an emailed statement.

The high-profile trial, seen as one of the last to involve an alleged Nazi war criminal, has led to much soul-searching on the subject of delayed justice.

The fact that the accused was a Ukrainian-born POW being tried in the same country that started the war, perpetrated the Holocaust and recruited Demjanjuk has also raised questions.

Serge Klarsfeld, a French lawyer and Nazi hunter, has expressed frustration with the trial, saying it failed to provide new details about the case and could not prove Demjanjuk’s direct participation in the killings.

Much of the prosecution case rested on an SS identity card of one Ivan Demjanjuk, which the defence said was a fake.

Judge Alt said there was “no objective evidence it didn’t belong to the accused.”

Demjanjuk’s lawyer Ulrich Busch welcomed his client’s release, saying he would probably be looked after by the Ukrainian community in Munich. Court officials suggested it could take months before an appeal is heard.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Public defender in Cleveland seeks to help John Demjanjuk, says case may have been tainted

CLEVELAND, Ohio –

A local federal public defender said Friday that he wants to help suspected Nazi prison guard John Demjanjuk, claiming an FBI document unearthed this month undermines the government’s longstanding legal fight against him.

The 91-year-old Demjanjuk is on trial in Germany, accused of complicity in the deaths of more than 27,000 people at the Sobibor death camp in Nazi-occupied Poland. He was deported to Munich nearly two years ago after U.S. judges ruled he lied about his wartime past.

dem.jpg

In a motion filed in U.S. District Court in Cleveland, Public Defender Dennis Terez said all of Demjanjuk’s legal proceedings to date may have been tainted because he believes defense attorneys have not seen all the documents in the case.

He cited a newly found 1985 report by the Cleveland FBI office, which indicated that the Soviet KGB may have worked to create false information about Demjanjuk. The report suggested that a Nazi guard identification card, also called a pass, may have been forged, a claim Demjanjuk’s supporters have made for years.

 

John DemjanjukView full sizeAPJohn Demjanjuk is brought into the courtroom in Munich, Germany, on Feb. 22.

The report said federal authorities sought information from the Soviets about suspected Nazi persecutors. The KGB then produced “a record purporting to tie the accused with the commission of Nazi atrocities, which record may be falsified for the express purpose of discrediting the accused,” the report said.

“The end result is that justice is ill-served in the prosecution of an American citizen on evidence, which is not only normally inadmissible in a court of law, but based on evidence and allegations quite likely fabricated by the KGB,” the FBI report said.

The pass, known as the Trawniki card, has a picture and Nazi identification number of a man named Ivan Demjanjuk, who has the same birth date, hair color, scar on his back and father’s name as the former Seven Hills’ autoworker.

The Associated Press found the report this month in declassified government documents. The news agency reported that Demjanjuk’s attorneys in Munich sought to stop the trial so they could study more documents in the United States. A German judge refused. A verdict is expected in May.

 

Dennis Terez.JPG Public defender Dennis Terez, shown in 2006.

Demjanjuk’s deportation to Germany came years after a federal judge in Cleveland stripped Demjanjuk of his citizenship following a 2001 trial.

“The case was tried, judgment entered, and the judgment affirmed,” Terez said. “But the government knew then what the world knows now, namely, that its case had been judged not credible by its own FBI.”

Eli Rosenbaum, the director of the U.S. Justice Department unit that brought the case against Demjanjuk, could not be reached Friday. But Jonathan Drimmer, the former prosecutor who tried the case in Cleveland, said he never saw or heard of the FBI report.

He said he believes the card is authentic, based on extensive testing of handwriting, paper and ink. He also said there were tests on the typewriting and photograph.

“I don’t think there is a single piece of legal evidence that has undergone more scientific and forensic testing than the Trawniki identification card of John Demjanjuk,” he said.

Demjanjuk was first accused of being a Nazi guard in 1977, when federal prosecutors identified him as a sadistic camp guard known as Ivan the Terrible, a case based on eyewitness testimony. He was convicted in Israel and spent about six years on death row.

While in Israel, the public defender’s office in Cleveland was appointed to represent Demjanjuk in his U.S. appeals. In 1993, his conviction in Israel was overturned, after another man was identified as being the guard.

After he returned to Seven Hills, federal prosecutors accused him again, this time using the wartime documents, including the now-questioned Trawniki card to link him to Sobibor and other two camps.

Enhanced by Zemanta