Tag-Archive for » Southern Poverty Law Center «

N.J. white supremacists arrested in New Year’s hate crime

gavel.jpg

Two men who are members of New Jersey-based white supremacist groups have been charged in a New Year‘s Eve beating that targeted three Arabic men last year.

SAYREVILLE — It was a New Year’s party with an ugly resolution for the coming year — go out and beat up Arabs.

Two members of New Jersey-based white supremacist groups were arrested by the FBI today, charged in a hate crime assault that followed a night of drinking at what authorities called a New Year’s Eve “meet and greet” social gathering for skinheads last December.

Federal authorities say the two went out looking for non-whites to attack after the party, and drove to an unnamed apartment complex in Sayreville to find them. Shouting anti-Arab slurs, the two allegedly confronted three residents outside the complex, brandished a knife and used brass knuckles and their fists in a series of unprovoked attacks.

Charged were Christopher Ising, 31, of Waretown, a purported member of white supremacist organization known as the “Atlantic City Skins,” and Michal Gunar, 27, of East Windsor, an alleged member of the “Aryan Terror Brigade.”

Both organizations are on the watch lists of the Southern Poverty Law Center and the Anti-Defamation League as “active skinhead hate groups.”

According to the ADL, the Atlantic City Skins is the largest of the New Jersey-based racist skinhead groups in numbers and reach, and has ties to some outlaw motorcycle groups.

Mark Potok, a senior fellow at SPLC, said the Aryan Terror Brigade has 21 chapters in 19 states, and a web page posting names and addresses of so-called “race traitors.”

In an indictment unsealed in Newark, Ising and Gunar were charged with conspiracy and commission of a hate crime, U.S. Attorney Paul Fishman said.

Ising has a history of violence. When he was 17, he pleaded guilty to pummeling a 14-year-old girl in the head with his fists and a crowbar. The girl, who had once dated Ising, was badly injured. Federal prosecutors said he spent 10 years in state prison for the crime and has had other run-ins with the law.

In the two-count indictment released today, Ising is said to have hosted the New Year’s Eve party last year at his former home in East Brunswick, drinking, listening to white supremacist music and talking with others about where they could go to attack non-whites.

 24/7 Download our free NJ.com mobile and tablet apps to keep up with the latest New Jersey news, sports and entertainment.

Shortly before midnight, authorities said, Ising, who has swastika tattoos on his arms and down his back, drove with Gunar to Sayreville, looking for targets. They set upon three victims of Egyptian descent, identified only by their initials.

One was punched in the face and head after being confronted in the apartment complex parking lot, as Gunar allegedly stated “show me your faces you Arab mother [expletive],” according to the indictment. Ising allegedly assaulted a second man with brass knuckles to the head.

Authorities said Gunar bragged about the encounter on the internet, claiming “it was me and my other bro on like 6 or eight and we whooped them.”

In federal court today before U.S. Magistrate Judge Cathy Waldor in Newark, Assistant U.S. Attorney Andrew Kogan asked Ising be detained pending a bail hearing, citing his criminal past.

“He is a risk to the community,” Kogan said.

Ising, a big man with a shaved head, wearing a black hooded Giants sweatshirt and steel shackles, did not contest the detention order, but asked for a quick bail hearing.

“Christmas is a week away. This is something that happened a year ago,” he said in a low voice to his court-appointed attorney.

He was ordered held, ending an arraignment Jan. 3. Gunar, arrested later in the afternoon, is due to appear in court today.

If convicted, both face up to 10 years in prison and fines of up to $250,000.

Enhanced by Zemanta

About 70 Alabama Schools to Participate in ‘Mix It up at Lunch Day’ Despite Family Group Backlash

Opposition from the American Family Association is not stopping about 70 Alabama schools from participating in a program that encourages schoolchildren to sit at different lunch tables and meet new people on Tuesday.

The program, “Mix It Up at Lunch Day,” is promoted by Teaching Tolerance, a project of the Southern Poverty Law Center. The program encourages schools to help students to sit with groups and people they would not normally mingle with, and learn about lives and interests. Teaching Tolerance director Maureen Costello says Mix It Up is an “anti-bias” program.

“‘Mix It Up’ is a very simple program meant to challenge the idea of stereotypes,” Costello said. “It’s just sitting down and breaking bread with someone from a different group.”

About 3,000 schools across the nation are set to participate today, according to a press release from SPLC. But the conservative American Family Association has encouraged parents to urge schools to withdraw from the program. According to an “Action Alert” on the AFA website, Mix It Up is part of plan to “promote the homosexual lifestyle in public schools.”

“‘Mix It Up’ day is an entry-level ‘diversity’ program designed specifically by SPCL [sic] to establish the acceptance of homosexuality into public schools, including elementary and junior high schools,” the Action Alert states.

When asked for more information on the AFA resistance to the Mix It Up program, an AFA staffer responded in an e-mail.

“While ‘Mix It Up’ day sounds wonderful on its surface, they are using it to get names of schools to add to their partnership lists that they will then use to send out information and learning materials on other programs, such as teaching children as young as kindergarten, that being gay is okay and it is not sinful,” AFA staffer Anelese Holt wrote in an e-mail.

“Many times students request the free information on ‘Mix-It-Up’ day and are thereby inadvertently giving this group their school’s name,” Holt wrote. “The principals, superintendents and school boards are often unaware of their ‘partnership’ with this radical organization.  Once they receive this ‘partner’ status the SPLC will begin to send them information on other programs that are not so innocent.”

“This is a totally inaccurate representation of how people come to Teaching Tolerance to get information,” Costello said.

“People who sign up for ‘Mix’ don’t get information for other programs unless they ask for them.”

AFA is listed on the SPLC website as an anti-gay group, and a note in response to AFA’s campaign on the Teaching Tolerance website describes AFA as “a group that specializes in demonizing the LGBT community and stirring up hate.”

 

Costello said that Mix It Up day was started 11 years ago with race in mind, and the program expanded to include socioeconomic status, disabilities, and other factors.

The Christian Science Monitor reported Monday that the Mix It Up program saw a 30 percent increase in participation in 2012 over 2011.

Click here to view a map of schools participating in the 2012 Mix It Up at Lunch Day.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Christian group protests anti-bullying program

On Mix It Up at Lunch Day, schoolchildren around the country are encouraged to hang out with someone they normally might not speak to.

The program, started 11 years ago by the Southern Poverty Law Center and now in more than 2,500 schools, was intended as a way to break up cliques and prevent bullying.

But this year, the American Family Association, a conservative evangelical group, has called the project “a nationwide push to promote the homosexual lifestyle in public schools” and is urging parents to keep their children home from school Oct. 30, the day most of the schools plan to participate this year.

“I was surprised that they completely lied about what Mix It Up Day is,” said Maureen Costello, the director of the center’s Teaching Tolerance project, which organizes the program. “It was a cynical, fear-mongering tactic.”

The swirl around Mix It Up at Lunch Day reflects a deeper battle between the Southern Poverty Law Center, a civil-rights group founded 41 years ago in Montgomery, Ala., and the American Family Association, a Bible-based cultural watchdog organization in Tupelo, Miss. The association says its mission is to fight what it calls the “increasing ungodliness” in America.

The law center recently added the group to its national list of active hate groups, which also includes neo-Nazis, black separatists and Holocaust deniers. Association leaders, in return, have called the law center a hate group for oppressing


Christian students

Enhanced by Zemanta

MSNBC Fears Romney has White Appeal

Fear has set in at MSNBC. Chris Matthews and Rachel Maddow are in a state of panic over the idea that Mitt Romney may appeal to white voters and that Obama may not. That Obama is running a campaign based on black racism and exploitation of ethnic divisions in society is of no concern to them.

Citing polling data that blacks and Hispanics are going for Obama, Maddow said on her August 24 show, “Mitt Romney’s only hope now is to win over white voters by a very large margin.” Maddow went on to say that she believes this is why Romney made a joke about Obama’s birth certificate. She made it clear that, in her mind, this was an unacceptable way to campaign and win votes.

Jared Taylor, who runs the organization American Renaissance, comments, “Rachel Maddow wonders whether Mitt Romney is trying to get ‘the white vote.’ What an idea! Everyone tries to cultivate blacks, Hispanics, and even Asians, but wouldn’t it be ‘racist’ to cultivate the white vote? Actually, because they cast 76.3 percent of the votes in the 2008 election, anything that shifts even one or two percent of whites your way is worth doing.”

Taylor told AIM, “Hispanics were only 7.4 percent of the electorate [in 2008], so getting just one percent more of whites to vote for you is like getting 10 percent more Hispanics. If you were Romney, where would you concentrate your efforts?”

The Obama campaign has run a 60-second ad, entitled “We’ve Got Your Back,” appealing to black voters’ nostalgia about the election of the nation’s first African-American president, calling for those voters to “have the President’s back” and stand with Obama again in November.

A black voter commented on the website where the ad is posted: “I am black and I think if Mitt Romney made an ad targeting white people that would be considered racist, but Obama can target blacks and it is not? Ridiculous.”

None of this is worthy of condemnation from the liberal commentators at MSNBC.

Jared Taylor, author of the book, White Identity, has been banned from most programs because he dares to talk about whites as people with special interests of their own, separate from various minority groups. “Only whites must always act as individuals and never as members of a group that promotes shared interests,” he notes in his book, in commenting on the politically correct mindset that prevails on racial matters in America.

The Southern Poverty Law Center, the far-left group that is said to have inspired the violent homosexual to open fire on the Washington office of the Family Research Council, has smeared Taylor as a “white nationalist.”

On her program, Maddow noted that an NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll showed Romney with zero percent of the African-American electorate and losing to Obama among Latinos by a 35-point margin. These lop-sided margins were not considered in any way racial by Maddow. Instead, she viewed them as an expression of legitimate political interests.

The idea of zero percentage of blacks voting for Romney didn’t strike Maddow as racist in any way.

But the notion that white people would vote for Romney, and that he would try to win their votes, was something that she rejected as improper and completely out of bounds.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Southern Poverty Law Center launches intolerant campaign against Family Research Council

The Southern Poverty Law Center is the nation’s self-appointed monitor of “hate groups.”

Too bad it can’t tell the difference between people who hate blacks and people who support the traditional definition of marriage. The SPLC’s promiscuous labeling of organizations it disagrees with as “hate groups” came to the fore last week when someone tried to shoot up one of its targets.

lowry.jpg

You may not have heard that an armed assailant stormed the offices of the Family Research Council. That’s because the assailant was a gay-rights activist and the assailed was an organization devoted to social-conservative causes. If circumstances had been reversed, you’d know. If a gun-toting Family Research Council volunteer had burst into the headquarters of the Human Rights Campaign, “60 Minutes” would already have done its hard-hitting feature on right-wing terrorism.

The SPLC calls the Family Research Council a “hate group.” This puts it in the same league as the True Invisible Empire Knights of the Ku Klux Klan, the Aryan Nation, the Supreme White Alliance, the Old Glory Skinheads and, of course, the American Nazi Party.

As they ask in kindergarten, which of these things isn’t like all the others? The home page of the Aryan Nation features an appeal to “white Americans” to fight anti-white genocide in South Africa, along with a photo of Nelson Mandela standing next to “the Jew Joe Slovo.” The home page of the Family Research Council has a tab to learn more about “Marriage, Family, & Sexuality.”

A man named Floyd Corkins allegedly showed up at the Family Research Council carrying a bag of Chick-fil-A sandwiches and a 9 mm and said, “I don’t like your politics” before shooting an unarmed guard who managed to subdue him (the guard is recovering). Corkins volunteers at a gay community center. According to an FBI affidavit, his parents “informed the FBI Special Agents that Corkins has strong opinions with respect to those he believes do not treat homosexuals in a fair manner.” Obviously.

The head of the Family Research Council, Tony Perkins, said the SPLC had given Corkins “a license to shoot.” This goes too far. Nothing the SPLC does sanctions violence, and Corkins’ alleged crime is his responsibility and his alone. But the SPLC’s designation of the Family Research Council is intolerant all the same, a bullying attempt to short-circuit free debate.

It’s not as if the SPLC considers the Family Research Council mildly offensive, or barely hateful. Asked if someone addressing a Family Research Council meeting was as guilty as someone addressing an Aryan Nation rally, the SPLC’s research director said “yes.” If Floyd Corkins took the SPLC’s attitude toward the Family Research Council seriously, he would have been shocked to be confronted by an African-American security guard instead of some guy in a white hood about to run out to burn a cross in a gay person’s front yard.

What the SPLC is doing is profoundly illiberal. The whole idea of a “hate group” is an organization that is so irrational and beyond the pale that it has no legitimacy. The SPLC brags about shutting down such groups, and rightly so. You presumably don’t have an argument with the White Patriot Party militia, unless you bring along a lead pipe. Putting the Family Research Council in the same category is a statement that it isn’t worthy of a democratic society. Its views shouldn’t be debated so much as shunned and marginalized.

This is the trend in the gay-marriage debate. The attempt to punish Chick-fil-A for the opinions of its founder and CEO, although an abject failure for now, will probably be the template of the future. “Liberals claim to want to give a hearing to other views,” William F. Buckley Jr., once said, “but then are shocked and offended to discover that there are other views.” The SPLC and its allies on the left won’t be satisfied until there are no other views on gay marriage.

Enhanced by Zemanta